Saturday, March 23, 2013
Monday, March 18, 2013
And the Judiciary thought its verdict was pragmatic enough..
And the Judiciary thought its
verdict was pragmatic enough..
A seething
minority, a buoyant majority and the damage that has been inflicted.
Welcome to the class of Political Insanity, to
the class of Theological Disparity and to the class of the Judiciary in an
imbroglio.
The last vestiges
of the much embattled idiosyncrasy of the existence of the Ram Janmabhoomi and
the Babri Masjid has been resolved (sic) as per the verdict of the Lucknow
Bench of the Allahabad High Court or so.
Applause
from the Hindutva ideology tottering Bharatiya Janta Party, the Vishwa Hindu
Parishad and the Rashtra Swyamsevak Sangh while gloom descending on the faces
of the leaders of the Sunni Waqf Board and the common minority in and around
the nation.
Pragmatism
evaded the verdict on one of the most unflinching issues ever in the dateline
of India as a nation. Something which completely transformed the political
ideologies and the game of politics, verdict on it came just as a blinding
shocker for the minority community.
Righteously
what had the Muslims envisaged never ever came to the forefront but yes the
litigant fighting over a ridiculous belief well over 5000 years had the
audacity to come out and flash unperturbedly a victory sign.
Who does
really care about the facts and evidences put across by the Sunni Waqf Board
when we all so unabatedly know about the character of these political stooges; I
hope you understood whom am I referring to?
Perhaps it
was the duty of the Judiciary to put the biased predicaments at peace, or
perhaps in a ridiculement of its own sense of belief the judiciary came out
with a verdict to masquerade the nexus between itself and the executive.
Whatever might
have been the circumstances, the Muslim community would have had haplessness
writ on their faces. Even if the verdict would have been in their favour, the
majority would have been left seething. Why?
Echoing the
much dramatized sentiments (sic) of the Hindutva leaders, “how can we have a
mosque been built at the place which is surrounded by Ram Lala and his kith and
kin?” “The Muslim community is
inflicting nails into its own coffin... we would strive ahead with all vigour
to prevent a mosque to ever come up at the revered birth place of Ram Lala.”
In the
scenario of the verdict tilting in the favour of the majority, which in some
sense has happened the Muslims would have been poked fun at unmistakably. All
previous statements of the BJP leaders have made the grass rougher and rougher.
The Muslim
community has been made to bleed a silent death ever since the 22nd
of December 1949 when the infamous Lord Ram idol was found within the vicinity
of the Babri Masjid. However, what really has put me in an amusing dilemma is
the fact that the Babri Masjid stood tall from 1527 till December 6th
1992.
India kept
evolving as a nation more or less be it under the Mughals or the British
Empire, had literary Hindu scholars like Swami Dayanand Saraswati whose sole
aim was to synchronise the chords of the nation again onto the path of Vedic
rituals but still Ayodhya existed, still the Ram Lala shared a perfect bonhomie
with Babri Masjid. Nobody thought of committing a crime so heinous of
destroying a place of worship!
But, sadly
as is not the case and on one fine morning of December 1992 the Babri Masjid
came crashing down. What would you’ve
expected from the Muslim brethren? Destroy any god damn temple and one would
get the answer best suited for this question.
Even after having survived this blot on their
shirt to have not been able to save this revered mosque the Muslim never
reverberated with the stinking apathy of the Hindu. Right Wingers might debate till
the very end that the minority can never even think of something a la Babri
Masjid but, the fact of the matter is that this community was never in the
reins of an ailing intelligentsia or that is how i feel.
They could
have reacted with the same brick batting, with the same mudslinging at each
other and sticking to the ages old idiom of ‘an eye for an eye’. There ain’t any less number of temples in
this nation and amusingly with the number of them present in Ayodhya, if the
common Muslim from the adjoining areas considering Ayodhya’s proximity to
Muslim dominated districts of Lucknow, Barabanki or the notoriously prominent
Azamgarh would have gone on the rampage then, a Mini Palestine would have been
created in the heart of the nation.
Also, then Ram would have been confined to the museums or the
excavations in Chitrakoot or further down under.
If Lucknow
burned in 1992 and Bombay in 1993, it primarily was the outcome of a community
venting its fury on repeatedly being termed as an outcast or perhaps an answer
to the ostracism of its beliefs. I applaud the Muslims for what they did in
1992 and more so for Godhra 2002, an eye opener for the hooligans of Ayodhya, be
it the beleaguered rustic impertinent politicians or the mindless karsewaks who
acted as per the whims and fancies of their masters. Godhra is an eyesore for
the right wingers, why? The Muslims just did what they felt pragmatic enough.
A three way
division of the 66.5 acres of land and the outright quashing of the title owner
petition of the Sunni Waqf Board by the justices of the bench of the Allahabad
High Court quite sums up the intention of the judiciary. What they claim as a
fair and balanced judgement is merely nothing than keeping all litigants at
tenterhooks to maintain a so what calm. I personally would give my approval to
the judgement which shall rule that the Babri Masjid land should be rightfully
returned back to the Muslims. A belief, five thousand years old cannot decide
the location of the Sanctum Sanctorum or the Garbha Griha: birth place of Ram.
Concluding
on a note which not many would agree to, i’d like the Sunni Waqf Board to step
up the pressure to rightfully acquire the land that has been taken away from
them. As commoners they’d still have to suffice with the embattled and lame
judiciary and their silence is sure to have been mistaken for some toothless
wisdom. Sadly it is not the case as the fury seething within.
Devang Chaturvedi
Thursday, March 14, 2013
Incredibly Creative!
Gautum Dutta is like any other middle class
Indian. Government employed, breadwinner for the family but there is something
about him that would make you connect instantly. Be it his infectious child
like smile, his love for speaking, his portly figure or his demeanor, which
speaks volumes of the person he is.
Clad in his uniform of a blue shirt and
black trousers, Gautam can be recognized from a distance even as far as a
hundred meters, always involved in some activity. Because when it comes to the
National Raliway Museum, situated in Chanakyapuri in New Delhi, Gautam has both
his hands full.
Affectionately addressed as ‘Gautam Da’, he
is recognized by one and all, greeted and smiled at. For, it’s him, who has
been a fulcrum of sorts for the Railway Museum for a sweet twenty five years
now.
He joined the Railway Museum in 1986 and
has reasons behind why he finally decided to move out of Calcutta.
“The political pressures in a state like
West Bengal are immense even on normal people and they are hounding most of the
times. There is not one household in West Bengal that does not have an artist.
The irony however is that the realization for many is not there. West Bengal is so much marred in its own sets of
problems, that the artist within never happens to recognize one’s potential.
Thankfully I’m not one of them.”
However, something else is of more interest
than him being the centre weight of the
museum. The marvelous models of the engines
on display, be it in the indoor gallery or the Souvenir Shoppe, most of them
have been handcrafted and designed by him.
Gautam’s initiation is self attributed.
Hailing from Calcutta (now Kolkata), West Bengal , Gautam made a replica of a water treatment
plan right outside his house as early as a student of the eighth standard. With
no background in engineering and architecture, this was no mean feat.
“My model was embraced by the Municipal
Corporation of Calcutta
who paid me a princely sum of Rupees two thousand. For a standard eighth
student, getting this much money, the joy was inexplicable,” says Gautam
Later his water treatment plan was selected
for the Ganga Action Plan when he was a student in Intermediate.
“The simplicity of the model caught the
attention of the eye of the officials for the Ganga Action Plan in Calcutta . When my father
came to know about this development his joy knew no bounds. We were a family in
cash crunch but my father made it sure that our schooling was best as per his
resources and I, proved it beyond doubt. Till this date I have never under gone
any training for the models that I make and yet they are so accurately made
each time. I’m left baffled at times too.”
He has made innumerable replicas of train engines,
but the one closest to his heart is that of the Great Indian Peninsular Railway
locomotive (GIP1), which was the first locomotive to ever run in India in 1853 from Bombay to Thane.
“When I made this particular locomotive, I
had a feeling as if I had been pushed behind in timeline. I considered myself
extremely fortunate in getting the opportunity to handcraft not just any other
model, but the first and one of the finest to have run on Indian soil.”
His technique is intensive and time
consuming. “I usually take about ten days to complete one model. Once done, and
if the demand is high, I can complete near about twenty models in a month’s
time. You need to get the process right in the first attempt and if it falters
then you falter on every model you make.”
The entire process depends upon how well
the wooden cast wheels adjust on the rails. Gautam usually takes the help of
technical people while placing the wheels, as one slight variation in size can
ruin the entire replica. Each wheel with all its spokes needs to be correct in
every dimension, he clarifies.
One needs to have oodles of confidence and
patience as not everything can be done by you explains Gautam. “The delays can
be inordinate. No one has a clue as to what time would be taken by the
fabricator to weld the aluminum sheets or the time taken by the glass caster. I
have to pressurize them each time but in the end they do the job for me.”
He has made a replica of Fairy Queen, which
is the world’s oldest running steam locomotive having been commissioned by the
Eastern Indian Railway (EIR) in 1855 but now being run by the Northern Railway,
operating between Delhi and Alwar via the Sariska Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan.
Other notable replicas to his credit are
those of the Patiala State Monorail Trainways (PMST), built for Maharaja of
Patiala State, Sir Bhupinder Singh in 1907 and a WAG Diesel locomotive, where W
stands for Broad Gauge, A for AC Traction and G for goods duty.
The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway System
(DHRS) and the Nilgiri Mountain Railway (NMR), UNESCO declared sights and India ’s
two of the three narrow gauge running toy trains have also been made into
replicas by Gautam.
India is a land of myriad charms and there
is no dearth of people like Gautam Dutta here, who listen to what their heart
says and do what they feel, gives them the maximum pleasure. He indeed is befitting
as a role model for all of those who still believe that doing what their heart
says is a pessimistic approach to life.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
The endless wait for a Common Regional Transport Authority for Delhi NCR
The endless
wait for a Common Regional Transport Authority for Delhi NCR
Devang
Chaturvedi
Shyamu
Rathore is approximately 24 years of age and has been driving an auto rickshaw
in Ghaziabad, UP for the past two years. The hired auto rickshaw that he drives
costs him Rs. 350 per day but Shyamu’s expenditure is just not limited to
hiring the auto. From CNG expenditure to bribing the Delhi and UP police at the
Ghaziabad-Loni-Anand Vihar border, his is a perfect example of how obligatory
they have to be just to avoid the excess tax levied inside Delhi.
An auto rickshaw that roughly costs Rs
1, 60,000 within UP is priced at a staggering
Rs 5, 34,000 in Delhi. An increased
price means an increased tax and hence the reluctance of crossing the border
inside the precincts of the national capital.
Public
Transportation mess in National capital region of Delhi is perhaps as old as
the National capital region itself. Inconvenienced commuters, harassed pliers
and the state governments in a deadlock, such are the state of affairs of the
public transportation in Delhi NCR to not talk about the counter magnates. It’s
been decades that the effects of this clutter are understood by the governments
or it may turn out to be yet another sore eye, aggravation of the masses
supreme on it.
The
circumstances are so dismal, that the average commuter, one who doesn’t use or
perhaps is not able to use the Delhi Metro or the State Transport Corporation
buses but rather uses the auto rickshaw or the cab is left stranded at the
border in a state of utter disarray.
The commuter
has two options broadly put across. One, he may disembark from the auto rickshaw
at the border and board an auto to further prolong his ride to the destination
he intends to. Two, he may agree to shell out any exorbitant amount the auto
rickshaw driver has the audacity to ask for.
The Auto
rickshaw driver cannot be put at fault if he intends to charge you more than
what should be the tangible cost. For each time he ferries across the border he
has to shell out the taxes levied on interstate movement. Not to forget, the
excess bribe that he pays the cop at duty, which ever state he might be from.
“Delhi transport authorities do not
permit tax wavers, however UP transport authorities cannot make it binding for
the auto rickshaws coming from the other side of the border. The Govt. of Uttar
Pradesh is open to the proposal of one transport jurisdiction for the area of
Delhi NCR, but the going may be not as uncomplicated as it seems on paper”,
claims Jaishankar Tiwari, Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Noida).
He further
outlines on why it may be difficult to
set one taxation rate in the region, “Taxation comes under the state list
and the revenue generated is directly transferred from the region into the
state treasury. Different rates of taxation are applicable in different states.
Since, the revenue generated is immense neither of the state’s may be willing
to part with this source of income”
Further he
claims, “The standards and rates for auto rickshaws were fixed in 2005 and
there hasn’t been a revision since. Rates and standards are set by the state
government keeping in mind the paying capacity of masses all across the length
and breadth of the state. What a person may be able to pay in Delhi NCR, a
person using an auto rickshaw in a district as remote as Maharajganj in UP may
not be able to. Rates have to be all inclusive. There needs to be a parity
maintained in the state.”
Lastly he
asserts, “The Government of Uttar Pradesh wishes to express solidarity with the
aggravations of the commuters and the auto rickshaw drivers and intends to put
across that commuter satisfaction as with a solution for the crisis is what
their definitive purpose is; even if that may come at the expense of parting
with the taxation revenue somewhat.”
However, the
Gurgaon Regional Transport Officer’s office gives an entirely different yet
somewhat amusing perspective. On being asked why auto rickshaw’s plying in
Gurgaon and Faridabad, two bordering districts of Haryana, do not wish to cross
over inside the Delhi border, the reply was, “They cannot. They can only go at
the maximum of 5 kms and not beyond.”
Further, on
being asked a possible solution for this problem the reply was, “Change the
auto rickshaw at the border and continue with a Delhi registered auto rickshaw.”
The National Capital Region Planning
Board (NCRPB) a statutory body under the Ministry of Urban Development, Govt.
of India however has
proposed in its Transportation Plan 2021,
unrestricted movement of auto rickshaws, cabs and buses across the border of
Delhi and adjoining districts of Noida and Ghaziabad under UP and Gurgaon and
Faridabad under Haryana.
It proposes
to develop Mass Rapid Transit Systems (MRTS) and Regional Rapid Transit Systems
(RRTS) so as to ensure high velocity movement of public and commercial
transportation within the boundaries of the concerned states.
It also
proposes the establishment of a co-ordinating agency, constituted by
representatives from each different state who would co-ordinate and take an
overall integrated view of the transportation facilities and hassles. An authority for the region could thus be
constituted either through fresh legislation under Clause (i) of Article 252 of
the Indian Constitution with the consent of states involved or through
resolution of the board itself, which would be of a non statutory nature.
An official
on condition of anonymity from NCRPB on being asked about the problem of
interstate plying of Auto rickshaws said, “Tax avoidance at the moment is the
only available outcome of this crisis for the auto rickshaw drivers.”
He however
recommended that, “Tax payment is the kind of recurring expenditure that
proposes an investment of a sum for a year. You pay the entire tax once and
then your commuting is unrestricted. Radio Cabs and Chartered Buses do so but
they are not required to pay tax to and fro.
In the case of auto rickshaws
however, the payment is to and fro. NCRPB is ready with the implementation of
one way tax payment for the auto rickshaws too but a Supreme Court order has
restrained the proceedings.”
The idea for
one jurisdiction of this entire area has already been mooted and deliberated
upon. The implementation however remains an unfinished task. With none of the
states willing to give up the lucrative revenue generation the execution it
seems would remain to be a thorn in the eye. The commuters can only hope that
sense prevails and a common regional transport authority eliminates these
overbearing hassles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)